Ambalam:

Wayside Shelters, Frequent Paths

 

Wes Janz

(Proceedings of the ACSA East Regional Conference, 2004, presented at ACSA East Regional Conference, October 2003)

 

An ambalama is a wayside shelter erected along frequented paths in Sri Lanka.  A typical shelter is square, with a foundation, four corner posts made of stone or wood, and a thatched roof.  More complex ambalam feature additional pillars, sub-compartments, painting, and carved detailing (see below).  An ambalama serves several purposes: as rest stop for strangers, or as local gathering place for exchanging news or having a quiet chew.  Today, an ambalama might be inhabited for a night by a homeless person, or for weeks by a grandparent who needs to get away from his or her family.  In all cases, any person is welcome and might find provisions waiting, most frequently water.

 

 

I have built several metaphorical ambalam recently – all influenced by experiences as co-director of CapAsia II in 2001 and as co-director of the three-week Sri Lankan component of CapAsia III in 2003.  Each ambalama offered provisions, each is alongside paths taking me to new understandings.  They exist within three contexts: with three collaborators (known as 26.26.26.25) in the US and Argentina; a 2002 graduate studio at Ball State with students from nine countries; and pavilions constructed in Sri Lanka.

 

To connect to the larger world with one’s eyes, heart, and mind open is to realize the challenges confronting most people.  Many millions live in cities undergoing extraordinary growth, build houses and places of business made from re-re-recycled materials, and live in conditions unknowable to others more privileged. 

 

Paul Hirst in his piece ‘Cities: From Ancient Greece to Globalization’ offers one wayside, Cairo, Egypt, a sprawling ‘anticity’ filled with shanty dwellers where growth fueled by uncontrolled rural migration renders the metropolis all but ungovernable.  ‘Such a prospect is disturbing,’ says Hirst, ‘because Westerners have tended to see urbanization as progress and the city as a force of order.’

 

Issues challenging Africa, south Asia, Europe, and Latin America today are present in the US, not in the future, but now.  To research her book Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America, Barbara Ehrenreich worked at three minimum wage jobs.  Her book documents the special costs endured by working poor for food, health care, child care, and housing.  In a recent lecture at Ball State, Ehrenreich argued that minimum wage workers are the true philanthropists: their back-breaking work – their ‘giving’ -- done for minimum wage enables many to enjoy a life of fulfillment and leisure. 

 

Does what is generally considered to be relevant architectural knowledge have any traction when placed under such economic, political, and social pressures?  What can be done as an architect to address these issues?  I think and act small.  I build now – right now -- in order to build continuously.  I build for one in order to reach many.  And I build with young architects.

 

Ambalama 1: Arbor

Following CapAsia II, 26.26.26.25 collaborator Jerome Daksiewicz and I designed and began construction of an arbor in my backyard.  Made primarily of no cost materials (cut saplings and downed branches), the structure is impermanent, incomplete, in need of constant attention.  No electricity and no trucks were allowed, even though there is electricity and a driveway.  A galvanized steel frame and sapling columns and beams are partially covered with galvanized wire mesh, a vine, and lights.  Details and tools are simple: wire ties the construction together; pruning shears cut branches and galvanized wire, needle-nose pliers pull the wire tight.  Total cost:  $337.

 

 

There’s a lot of living and dying in our backyard.  Many animals gather, and flowers BLOOM!  All year, now, animals are dying too, and in the fall, the annual flowers die.  My dad died in 1993 and my mom died ten months ago, both of cancer.  I emptied their house last year and found meaning-filled building material.  My mother’s rolling pin, and wood dad harvested from his own father’s forest and shaped with his hands now feel my touch.  Here, my parents’ deaths extend the arbor’s life and alter its character, and mine.

 

Students Jerome, Sohith, and Brooke contributed early; Nick, Ryan, Laura, Melissa, Jenn, Kurt and Kevin stop by, for meals, an evening, a class, and sometimes they build.  I move from what they create; focus my vision through the lenses they provide.  The arbor is part of my life – I work on it every day -- and a frequent stop for others as well.

 

Ambalama 2:  Bus Shelter

Bloomington, Indiana is a key source of limestone in the US and world.  The Empire State Building, the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, the Guggenheim Bilbao Museum, and the reconstructed parts of the Pentagon are made of Indiana limestone.  When a competition for three bus shelters in Bloomington was announced in 2002, 26.26.26.25 looked to limestone.  But a budget of $22,000 per shelter worked against such a response.

 

Following visits to quarries and a finishing mill, a design of ‘rough back’ limestone blocks – considered waste material because it is defined by undesirable imperfections -- emerged.  To quote from e-mails: “each big rough back block will be cut simply into cubes 2’ on a side.  On some blocks, the raw face will be partially sliced off, ‘finishing’ by leaving it partially original.  We’ll use the cheapest, lowest grade of limestone raw and make it beautiful.  The blocks’ laid up raw faces to the street and bus, the sliced sides to the houses . . .  the wall as mass and mysterious structure attacked by futuristic sci-fi japanimation virus of steel lines and folded/sliced sheets of steel . . .  Also, to revisit the idea of slowness and movement and buses pulling to a stop, maybe the blocks are much longer at the end of the wall from which the bus approaches, then the blocks shorten as they get to the other end, where the bus stops . .”

 

 

 

In this proposed ambalama, limestone was to reconnect the travelers with the source of the community, the land and the rock, and each other.

 

Ambalama 3: String Installations

26.26.26.25 created three ‘space sketch’ installations in Buenos Aires and Rosario, Argentina in June 2003.

 

In the late 1970’s and early 1980’s, 30,000 Argentinians were taken away by the military, never to be seen or heard from again.  Our site was the atrium of the Design and Architecture Building at the National University of Buenos Aires.  During the ‘dark years,’ students did not cross the atrium, for fear they would be seen by military sympathizers.  Today, the atrium belongs to the students.  Large banners hang here, including one with names of two hundred former students, two hundred of the missing, and another large banner calling for the removal of the dean.

 

We extended the 2D banners into 3D spatial explorations of line, plane, and volume, imagining a ‘3D book’ for ‘readers’ to walk in, with text messages projected onto floating planes of fabric, shaping intimate spaces for debates and discussions.  String became our sole building material.  It was inexpensive (there was no budget for the project) and mimicked the cable lines of the atrium banners.  No tools were needed.

 

Upon our arrival, we were told the atrium was off-limits.  A controversial presidential election made university administrators nervous and they did not want four ‘yanquis’ to upset students.  Two other spaces were assigned and string pieces were completed in each.  A third string installation was completed in Rosario.  Each installation was inspired by two factors.  First, to use lines of string to blur distinctions between spatial solids and voids found in each space.  Second, to bring a construction system with us (literally in our luggage) that would bring out details and aspects of the local context unknown to locals, those who claim to ‘know’ the space. 

 

 

This wayside is the simplest, and still, the most complex of the five ambalam.  It accepts the limitations of one material, took no tools to install, adjusts itself to multiple unknowable sites, and flexs in response to the strongest of political pressures.

 

Ambalama: Settlement, Dwelling, and Platform

Our fall 2002 post-professional graduate studio was titled “Leftover Spaces, Leftover Materials, Leftover People.”  Seventeen students undertook two projects.  Each was to design and build a dwelling as part of a larger informal settlement occupied during an academic festival.  The second, an overnight sleeping platform. 

 

In the first project, found materials were to be assembled in a busy, but undistinguished open space on campus.  Students lived in dwellings (and I slept on a park bench) for four evenings in late September (one night the temperature fell to 37 degrees Fahrenheit). 

 

 

Weeks later, the design and construction of a temporary platform used for one night to occupy a very public space without permission or being seen.  Favored strategies involved disguising one’s place as a construction site, enclosing space over heating vents, or sleeping in modified cardboard boxes

 

With these shelters, students, and I, took unfamiliar paths, ones not frequented by many, if any.  When we gathered to talk, I asked: Do you feel more or less like an architect?  The answer: both.  ‘More’ as paper designs became full-scale realities.  ‘More’ as the young architects considered thermal comfort because they were COLD.  ‘More’ because curious spectators respected the architects’ work.  ‘Less’ as every dwelling failed miserably.  ‘Less’ meant not wanting to be recognized as an architect once each realized the tremendous amount of wasted but perfectly good building material available.  ‘Less like an architect’ maybe meant one didn’t want to be that sort of architect any more.

 

Ambalama 5:  Sri Lanka Pavilions

In early 2003, along with Nihal Perera and Madhura Prematilleke, Vijitha Basnayaka, and Varuna de Silva, I led a ten-day ‘build-design-build’ project at the University of Moratuwa in Katubeddah, Sri Lanka with fifteen CapAsia students, and forty-five second year architecture students from Moratuwa. 

 

One team was to create a pavilion made primarily of scavenged wood materials (dismantled wood packing crates, disassembled timber pallets, and hand sawn tree trunks).  The other team designed and constructed a ‘mud’ pavilion built of rubble from demolished campus buildings and engineering college experiments, rice sacks, and an earth/sand/cement mixture.

 

 

Architecture professors tend to speak of ‘learning by building.’  In this sense, ‘to build’ refers to the acquisition of established knowledge regarding construction, materials, and details.  ‘Building to learn’ inverts as it expands the paradigm.  CapAsia students worked in a different country, on teams with students who (might) speak English as a second language, in a society with its own perspectives regarding the environment, locally available materials, recycling, and, one should say, America and Americans.  In this sense, new knowledge about the design and planning fields is revealed, as new uses are found for existing knowledge.  As important, if not more so, for the Ball State students ‘building to learn’ refers to learning about one’s self in relation to the ‘other,’ rethinking one’s place in the world, and questioning, fundamentally, how one chooses to engage the world and its people first as a fellow human being, then as architect, planner, or designer. 

 

In a moment, I’ll return to the ambalam of Sri Lanka.  But first, I want to bring in a few comments by Tod Williams and Billie Tsien, two accomplished designers, best known for their projects in midtown Manhattan, Phoenix, Arizona; La Jolla, California; and near Detroit.  I like, very much, their simple statement of ultimate intent: to be of use:

 

For us, life and work are a single path with no discernible end.  It seems to be a spiraling route which often returns almost to the same place, merely slightly higher or lower.  The work that we do searches for authenticity by listening hard and then starting down the path, one foot in front of the other – not very nimbly, with false starts and stumbles – not knowing the outcome but always learning something new along the way.  To be of use is the name of the path.  Every day in our practice we try to take another step.

 

Now, to the ambalam.  Can we turn our consideration of the ambalama around, imagining ourselves not as the visitor, but as the structure?  Might we – and that could mean we as accomplished architects, as professors, as young architects – might we provide a place to rest, a bit of shelter, some provisions for others, even for strangers?  Might we define our profession or work as citizen-architects on these terms?

 

 

To be of use.

 

The arbor’s hammock swing for my wife Marcia, my students working on the structure.  The seat and roof of the shelter for tired bus riders.  The fragmented barrel vault formed by string for the design students in Buenos Aires, honoring their long lost colleagues.  The cellist who visited the informal settlement we designed, built, and occupied.  And the timber and mud pavilions in Sri Lanka, holding lunch time discussions, sketching exercises, romantic liaisons of young college students, naps in the warming sun.

 

To be of use,

 

I think and act small.  I build now – right now -- in order to build continuously.  I build for one in order to reach many.  And I build with young architects.

 

To be of use.

 

 

REFERENCES

Ehrenreich, Barbara.  Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America.  New York: Metropolitan Books, 2001.

Hirst, Paul, “Cities: From Ancient Greece to Globalization.”  In Ephemeral Structures in the City of Athens International Architectural Competition The Programme, edited by Maria Theodorou, 41-54.  Athens, Greece: 2002 Cultural Olympiad 2001-2004, Hellenic Cultural Heritage SA, 2002.

Lewcock, Ronald, Barbara Sansoni, and Laki Senanayake.  The Architecture of an Island: The Living Heritage of Sri Lanka.  Colombo, Sri Lanka: Barefoot (Pvt) Ltd, 2002.

Williams, Tod and Billie Tsien.  Michigan Architecture Papers 5: Tod Williams Billie Tsien.  Edited by Brian Carter and Annette W. Le Cuyer.  Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan, 1998.