|
The following internal grant
proposal was funded on March 3rd, 2003:
OFFICE OF ASSOCIATE PROVOST
Ball State University
Memorandum
THE GEORGE AND FRANCES BALL FUND FOR ACADEMIC
EXCELLENCE
AND
THE 21ST CENTURY FUND FOR FACULTY DEVELOPMENT
Grant Proposal Cover Sheet – 2003 Program
| Proposal
Title: |
Faculty
Researching OnLine Education (Faculty ROLE) |
| Description: |
This
collaborative proposal seeks support for a faculty development workshop
for faculty who are scheduled to teach online courses from the College
of Applied Sciences & Technology. The purpose is twofold: to encourage
faculty to engage in meaningful research projects related to online
education; and to assist faculty in planning ways to integrate
empirically validated practices into their own pedagogy. |
| Type of
Proposal: |
Regular
or Collaborative
|
| Name of
Sponsoring Academic Units: |
Department of
Industry & Technology, School of Nursing, School of Physical Education,
Office of Teaching and Learning Advancement, University Libraries |
| Principal
Investigator: |
Jim Flowers,
Department of Industry & Technology and OTLA representative |
|
Co-Investigators: |
Nagia Ali, School of
Nursing
Kay Hodson-Carlton, School of Nursing
Mary Annette Rose, Department of Industry and Technology
Marilyn Ryan, School of Nursing
Valerie Wayda, School of Physical Education
|
| Total
Requested: |
$10,000 |
| Approval &
Support |
|
|
Department Chairs: |
Jack Wescott, Ind. &
Tech. |
Linda Siktberg, Nursing |
Mitchell Whaley,
Physical Ed. |
|
Deans: |
Nancy Kingsbury, CAST |
Arthur Häfner, Univ. Libraries |
Frank Sabatine, Extended Ed. |
| Others: |
Charles Jones, OTLA |
James Pyle, OARSP |
|
|
Please note:
|
After the College Dean has
signed the proposal, send the signed original along with 5 copies to
Office of Associate Provost – AD 326
Deadline: January 15, 2003 |
Faculty Researching
OnLine Education (Faculty ROLE)
A proposal for the George
and Francis Ball Fund for Academic Excellence
January 9, 2003
|
Principal Investigator:
|
Jim Flowers, Department of Industry and Technology;
representative for the Office of Teaching and Learning Advancement |
| Co-Investigators: |
Nagia Ali, School of Nursing
Kay Hodson-Carlton, School of Nursing
Mary Annette Rose, Department of Industry and Technology
Marilyn Ryan, School of Nursing
Valerie Wayda, School of Physical Education |
Faculty in the School of Nursing, the Department of Industry and
Technology, and the School of Physical Education of the College of Applied
Sciences and Technology (CAST) in conjunction with the Office of Teaching
and Learning Advancement and the University Libraries, are submitting a
collaborative proposal among these units and to the George and Francis
Ball Fund for Academic Excellence and The 21st Century Fund for
Faculty Development 2003 Program. The project is called “Faculty
Researching OnLine Education” or “Faculty ROLE.” It provides an intensive
3-day workshop over a 29-day period to encourage faculty who teach online
in the College to engage in research in online teaching and learning that
will translate to improvements in their online teaching.
Goal
The goal of the project is to
improve online education at Ball State
University through collaborative research projects by supporting the
teacher-scholar model.
Objectives
Each
participant will:
-
Improve their online pedagogical skills by reviewing research literature
on best practices for teaching/learning online.
-
Characterize the phenomenon of online learning, in terms of current
learning theories.
-
Develop an individual or collaborative research proposal related to online
teaching and learning, or develop a teaching plan to apply research
results in online education.
-
Identify resources and assistance available at Ball
State
University for researching online teaching learning.
-
Identify outlets for scholarly publications and presentations of research
on online teaching and learning.
Strategic Plan Objectives Addressed
The following objectives from
the Ball State University Strategic Plan are addressed by this project
“I. 7. Integrate learning
with faculty scholarship consistent with the teacher-scholar model.”
“I. 8. Support a collegial
environment that encourages faculty and professional personnel to interact
with each other and with students.”
“III. 3. Support scholarship,
inquiry, research, creative endeavor, and interdisciplinary activity.”
“III. 4. Expand programs for
rewards, recognition, and professional development.”
“III. 5. Develop additional
incentives to increase external funding.”
“IV. 5. Increase enrollment
in distance education.”
Anticipated Benefits
(with reference to objectives from the BSU Strategic Plan)
Within
the College of
Applied Sciences and Technology,
graduate degrees are now offered entirely online from the School of
Nursing (MS in Nursing), the School of
Physical Education (MA in
Coaching), and the Department of Industry and Technology (MA in Technology
Education, and MA in Industrial Vocational/Technical Education). These are
Ball State
University’s only online graduate degree programs, serving
approximately 400 students.
Faculty who have in the past
taught in the classroom are now developing and delivering Internet-mediated
instruction. Although these faculty members may well be content experts and
accomplished face-to-face teachers, many have received little training in
online pedagogy. Training that has occurred is often related to technical
issues of course management software or Web page creation. There is a clear
need for faculty who teach online to translate current research in online
pedagogy to their own teaching practices (I.7). This can only be done if
these faculty are well versed in the research literature in this area
(III.3).
Online
education is still a developing field, and it abounds with unanswered
research questions. With three programs approved for online delivery
within the last year, there is an abundance of meaningful research
opportunities across disciplines, both at the course and program levels.
However, a number of
meta-analyses have resulted in conclusions that much of the current research
in distance learning is weak, redundant, or flawed (Berge & Mrozowski, 2001;
Diaz, 2000; Lockee, Moore, & Burton, 2001). As Mark Windschitl (1998) noted
regarding research on online education:
The vast majority of published work is descriptive of
technology implementation in classrooms or tends to be intuitive analyses of
what works and what doesn’t work with students. The literature stops short
of asking critical questions such as, “Are these practices helping students,
and if so, how?” or, “How is the introduction of this technology changing
pedagogical practices?” I argue for stronger research focus on aspects of
learning and teaching as influenced by the use of the WWW… (p.28)
However, areas in need of
research and types of studies most needed have been identified. Therefore,
online teacher/scholars at Ball State would be well-served by a workshop
that specifically helps them pursue more meaningful lines of research
related to their online teaching, overcoming or avoiding some of the common
pitfalls (I.7).
This project would promote
collaboration among faculty (I.8). For example, the replication of a study
with students in different online programs within the College (I.8) can
provide researchers with more generalizable results, improving the chances
for publication. In instances where collaboration is required for funding,
chances of receiving funding increase (III.5).
In placing these degree
programs online, Ball State
University is leading online education in these niche markets. By encouraging
faculty to become active researchers in online education,
Ball State can
become a leader known also for research in online learning (I.7) – largely
in these same niche areas. For example, the Master of Arts in Technology
Education is currently the only master’s in this area known to be offered
entirely online; research specific to online learning in technology
education is needed, and it is logical for the field to look to Ball State
for much of that research.
Furthermore, the School of
Nursing is an acknowledged national leader in online nurse education with a
record of scholarly works, including 2001 and 2002 Nursing Education in
Research Grant awards from the National League for Nursing. Thus, research
proposals, publications, and presentations can continue and improve
Ball State
University’s identification in the field as a university involved
with online education, specifically with the niche areas represented by the
College’s online degrees (I.7). Research and publications may strengthen
programs by increasing online enrollment due to greater name association,
strengthened faculty teacher/scholars, and improved practices translated
from research to online teaching (I.7; IV.5).
As one of the collaborative
partners, the Office of Teaching and Learning Advancement (OTLA) has many
human and technical resources that are particularly well-suited to the
support of research-based online pedagogy. OTLA will be hosting the
workshops by providing participants with a state-of-the-art technical
environment as well as the expertise and experience of its staff. The
University Libraries, another collaborative partner, is a critical player in
uncovering the research that would inform future investigations and improve
online education, as well as in the identification of publication
opportunities. Support from the Office of Academic Research and Sponsored
Programs provides participants with expert assistance in finding funding
sources, and in the preparation and submission of research proposals. The
School of Extended Education
is a pivotal in the support, development, coordination, and implementation
of online courses, and will be able to provide answers to a number of likely
questions from participants.
The participant stipends
(listed as honoraria in the budget) and the faculty research and teaching
awards within this proposal may serve as an incentive to faculty in
developing proposals for external funding, or in the positive reinforcement
that can promote future efforts (III.4; III.5). These stipends and awards
promote the teacher-scholar model.
Participant Selection
Participants will be
recruited from the CAST faculty who teach online, or are scheduled to teach
online in the three academic units. Participants will complete an
application form that outlines their intentions. Fifteen participants will
be selected on a first-come basis.
Workshop Format and Activities
A 3-day workshop is proposed
for the Summer of 2003. Faculty who are assigned to develop or teach online
courses in the College of
Applied Sciences
and Technology will be invited to attend. Where guest speakers are provided,
these sessions will be open to any interested parties in the Ball State
Community.
The workshop will occur on
three Fridays: May 16th, May 30th, and
June 13th, 2003. This will provide sufficient time between workshop
meetings for substantive work by participants to meet the workshop’s
objectives.
The first day’s activities
(May 16th) will include a sharing of experiences and interests
among participants. A keynote address, open to the BSU community, will set
the stage, followed by a panel discussion of Ball State’s resources for supporting
the teacher scholar model regarding online education. Participating on that
panel will be the keynote speaker, one of the project’s investigators, and
representatives from the School of
Extended Education,
the University Libraries, the Office of Teaching and Learning Advancement,
and the Office of Academic Research and Sponsored Programs. Library
resources, research protocols, funding sources, and a review of research in
online education will be discussed on this day, as will examples of applying
research results to online education. Participants will then have two weeks
following this meeting (May 16th to May 30th) to read
relevant literature and to develop preliminary proposals for original
research (individual or collaborative) or preliminary teaching plans.
The second workshop day (May
30th) will begin with a presentation by a professional grant
reviewer (open to the BSU community), followed by a panel discussion on
“Applying Best Practices from Research to Online Teaching and Learning.” The
remainder of the day will be spent on the development and refinement of
participants’ research proposals and teaching plans. After the second
session, participants will have two weeks (May 30th to June 13th)
to read additional material, to complete the required Institutional Review
Board human subjects protection researchers’ training, if necessary, and to
revise their research proposal or teaching plans.
On the final workshop day
(June 13th), participants present their research proposals or
teaching plans for peer review. The feedback they receive should help them
refine their proposals and teaching plans, and by providing feedback to
others they will better understand typical review processes and gain greater
objectivity. Participants will complete an assessment of the workshop based
on the goal and objectives stated in this proposal. A final forum will
provide closure to the workshop and promote future collaborations.
By August 1, 2003, all
participants will be required to submit their teaching plan or research
proposal to the investigators in order to fulfill the requirements for their
workshop honorarium. These will be judged by expert reviewers, such as
representatives from the Office of Teaching and Learning Advancement and the
Office of Academic Research and Sponsored Programs, to determine the
recipients of the Most Promising Teaching Plan Award and Most Promising
Research Proposal Award, respectively. Awards will be announced shortly
thereafter, and will be acknowledged at Ball State’s
Annual Conference on Teaching and Learning.
Stipends/Honoraria/Awards
Each participant will receive
an honorarium of $300, contingent upon their attendance all three days and
their submission of either a research proposal in online education or a
teaching plan for applying research results to their online teaching. In
addition, the individual research design and the teaching plan judged as the
most promising will each be accompanied by a $200 award, and the
collaborative research design judged as the most promising will be
accompanied by a $400 award, payable in equal amounts to each collaborating
investigator. These awards will be acknowledged at Ball State’s
Annual Conference on Teaching and Learning.
References
Berge, Z. L., & Mrozowski, S.
(2001). Review of research in distance education, 1990 to 1999. The
American Journal of Distance Education, 15(3).
Diaz, D. Pl. (2000). Carving
a new path for distance education research. The Technology Source,
March/April 2000.
Lockee, B., Moore, M. &
Burton, J. (2001). Old concerns with new distance education research.
Educause Quarterly (2), 60-62.
Windschitl, M. (1998). The
WWW and classroom research: What path should we take? Educational
Researcher, 22 (1), 28-33.
Budget
| |
|
Grantee |
BSU |
|
|
Keynote Speaker Honorarium:
|
$800 |
|
|
|
Honorarium for Speaker on
Proposal Writing/Review: |
$800 |
|
|
|
Participant Honoraria ($300
each): |
$3,600 |
$900A |
|
|
Most Promising Research Awards ($200 and $400): |
$600 |
|
|
|
Most Promising Teaching Plan
Award: |
|
$200B |
|
|
Lunch, Snacks and Drinks:
|
$600 |
|
|
|
Reception: |
$200 |
|
|
|
Photocopies, Materials for
Participants: |
$200 |
|
|
|
Investigators (6 @ $500
each): |
$3,000 |
|
|
|
Student Assistant: |
$200 |
|
| |
|
|
|
Column Totals: |
$10,000 |
$1,100 |
| |
|
| |
Total Project Cost: |
--------- $11,100 --------
|
| |
Notes:
A: $900 funded by the Office
of Teaching and Learning Advancement
B: $200 funded by the
School of
Extended Education
|
|