For each assignment:
See the syllabus for formatting and other requirements.
Be sure to cite all the sources you use.
You will write a three-page (minimum) paper describing an
event that occurred in the history of psychology on your birth
date. To get a list of events, go to http://www.cwu.edu/~warren/
today.html, select the month and date of your birth from the
drop-down menus, and click on Search! (This
historical data base is maintained by Warren Street, a professor
of psychology at Central Washington University. To see a list of
other history links, replace today in the URL with
home.) Your paper is worth 20 points.
In your paper, do the following:
1. Pick one event that happened on your birth date and describe
it fully (one page minimum).
2. Describe the events that led up to the event that happened on
your birth date. That is, describe the historical context of the
event (one page minimum).
3. Describe the consequences of the event that happened on your
birth date. That is, describe some of the effects the event had
on the development of psychology (one page minimum).
Steven Haggbloom and his colleagues recently
published a list of the 100 most eminent psychologists of
the 20th century (Haggbloom, S. J. et al. [2002]. The 100
most eminent psychologists of the 20th century. Review of
General Psychology, 6, 139-152). The top 25 are listed
below.
Choose two psychologists from the list below and
for each write a 1-page (minumum) biographical essay explaining
why that person should be considered eminent. (I have the
complete list if you want to see it to choose someone with a
lower ranking.) Be sure to cite all the sources you use. Your
essay for each psychologist is worth 10 points (20 points total).
| 1. | B. F. Skinner | 10. | Abraham H. Maslow | 18. | Kurt Lewin |
| 2. | Jean Piaget | 11. | Gordon W. Allport | 19. | Donald O. Hebb |
| 3. | Sigmund Freud | 12. | Erik H. Erikson | 20. | George A. Miller |
| 4. | Albert Bandura | 13. | Hans J. Eysenck | 21. | Clark L. Hull |
| 5. | Leon Festinger | 14. | William James | 22. | Jerome Kagan |
| 6. | Carl R. Rogers | 15. | David C. McClelland | 23. | Carl G. Jung |
| 7. | Stanley Schachter | 16. | Raymond B. Cattell | 24. | Ivan P. Pavlov |
| 8. | Neal E, Miller | 17. | John B. Watson | 25. | Walter Mischel |
| 9. | Edward Thorndike |
In this paper you will trace the historical development of a
psychological concept (such as aggression, memory, language
development, etc.) that you learned about in one of your
Psychological Science classes. Your treatment of the historical
development of the concept should begin no later than the year
1800, but the majority of your paper should focus on the 20th and
21st centuries. At a minimum your paper should address the
following issues:
1. Philosophical background. What did
philosophers have to say about the concept prior to the
development of psychology as a science? (1 page minimum, 1.5
pages maximum)
2. Systems of psychology. Do one
of the following:
a. Describe how your concept was treated by two of the historical
schools of psychology: Structuralism, Functionalism, Gestalt,
Behaviorism, Humanistic, or Psychoanalytic. (1 page minimum for
each school)
b. Or, describe how your concept was treated by
two psychologists who wrote about the topic prior to 1930. Early
resources in psychology can be found at http://psychclassics.yorku.ca,
a historical web site maintained by Christopher Green, a
psychology professor at York University, Toronto, Canada. (1 page
minimum for each psychologist)
c. Or, Describe how your concept was treated by
one school and one psychologist writing prior to 1930. (1 page
minimum for each)
3. Current status. How do psychologists
currently treat the concept? At a minimum, address the following
questions:
a. How has thinking about the concept changed from its
philosophical roots to its current status? (1 page minimum)
b. How has research on the topic changed since 1900? (1 page
minimum)
The paper is worth 40 points.
Throughout its history psychology has a faced a
number of recurring, and sometimes continuing, questions and
issues. For this assignment you will reflect on your education as
a psychology student and provide your answers to three such
questions questions. In addressing the questions, explain your
answers fully and support your positions with appropriate
references from the professional psychological literature. Be
sure to answer these questions from the perspective of
psychology, not philosophy, religion, sociology, etc.,
unless you are comparing or contrasting the psychological
perspective with one of the others.
From the lists below, address two questions from
Set A and one question from Set B. Your answer
to each question is worth 10 points (30 points total).
Question Set A (Answer two of these)
1.What is the basic nature of human beings? That is, are people
basically good, basically bad, or do we start out as blank
slates and become good or based solely on experience?
2. How are the mind and the body related?
3.Which is more important in causing people to behave the way
they do, nature (e.g., genetic and/or biological factors) or
nurture (i.e., experience)?
4. What is the role of rationality in human
behavior? That is, do people make carefully considered, logical
choices, or is human behavior primarily nonrational or even
irrational?
5. How real is reality? That is, do the senses provide a direct,
100% accurate depiction of the world, or does the mind filter,
interpret, and/or distort sensory data so that each person
experiences his or her own unique version of reality?
Question Set B (Answer one of these)
6. Which is more important, applied, problem-focused psychology
or basic, theory-focused psychology?
7. How should psychological research be conducted? Should it be
objective, using traditional experimental and
measurement approaches that establish a moat between the
researcher and the research participants to prevent researcher
biases from contaminating the data? Or should it be
subjective, using techniques such as case studies and
interviews to develop an empathic understanding of
participants life experiences?
8. Are there some topics in psychology that researchers should
not study? If not, why not? If so, what are some examples of what
should not be studied and why should those topics be off-limits
to researchers?
Last updated: July 30, 2002