
Proposed Fiscal Stimulus Package has Costs
![]() |
By Michael J. Hicks February 02, 2009 E-mail Author |
|
|
The proposed fiscal stimulus package just passed by
the House of Representatives is the single largest one- time stimulus
ever, in the whole history of the world. I support the effort – in part
– but whatever your feelings, it is worth trying to understand it. As I’ve written before, for the stimulus to influence
this recession, it has to happen quickly, as in before the leaves return
to the trees in Indiana. Very little of the proposed spending in the
House plan will do this. Indeed, virtually nothing but the tax cut will
affect the domestic economy before the end of summer. This will almost
certainly be past the trough of the recession, and so contribute
minimally to the recovery. The economy is not bad enough, yet, for us to risk erring dramatically. I continue to hear great depression comparisons, but here in Indiana it will take something like 40 more months of job losses like those of November (the worst month so far) for us to have the great depression unemployment rates. A miscue on timing and we can have Jimmy Carter level inflation in 2010. The stimulus package is designed to help the economy
in two ways. Money spent on infrastructure will have an effect on future
productivity by improving mobility, communications and education. That
impact might justify the type of spending, but not the spending itself.
Under the most ideal circumstances every dollar of new infrastructure
spending will yield a penny or two in improved productivity each year
for a short while. That assumes no more ‘bridges to nowhere’ will be
tucked away in the package, a silly assumption. The second way the package stimulates the economy is
by spending today what might otherwise be spent in the future. That’s
all there is to it. There’s no magic government spending multiplier or
free lunch associated with expenditures of this sort. We simply
accelerate future investment for the sake of today. A mistake here is a
sure way to turn a dollar of federal spending into 30 cents of economic
growth. This type of accelerated spending now isn’t
necessarily a bad idea, but it all depends heavily upon what we buy.
Since we’re going to have to borrow the money, the benefits of spending
the money now should be greater than the benefit of waiting (since we
have also to pay interest). Too much spending on any one thing will
drive up prices (like asphalt). President Obama will have to count heavily on the
states, two thirds of whom are in dire financial straights with a
handful in real crisis. Rarely has Federal government policy relied so
much on the Governors. Expeditious and clever spending on roads,
infrastructure and in the half dozen states where it is possible, a tax
cut, will determine the success of the stimulus plan. |
||
Center for
Business and Economic Research | Phone: (765) 285 5926 | Fax: (765) 285 8024 |E-mail |Website:
www.bsu.edu/cber