| Indiana Business Bulletin | December 27, 2002 |
| Bureau of Business Research | Ball State University | Muncie, IN 47306 |
|
Crunch
Time for Manufacturing Economy |
||||
"After an impressive rebound from its recession low point of December 2001, factory output nationwide has slipped and stumbled since mid-summer. " |
||||
|
Maybe the best
plan of action for the manufacturing economy is to rip up the old
playbook and start all over again. Certainly
the second half of 2002 has been a disappointment.
After an impressive rebound from its recession low point of
December 2001, factory output nationwide has slipped and stumbled since
mid-summer. Coming into the
month of November, the manufacturing component of the Federal Reserve's
Index of Industrial Production had registered four consecutive monthly
declines. According to
the November report released by the Fed, that streak has now been
halted. The manufacturing
index edged up for the month by 0.1 percent, thanks largely to a 3.9
percent increase in the output of motor
vehicles.
But the details of the report confirm that the manufacturing
economy remains in very frail health. The November index is among the first to reflect the Federal government's new industry classification system -- the North American Industry Classification System, or NAICS. The impact of this change on manufacturing data is fairly small, with only a few individual industries, including portions of the printing, publishing,
|
and
lumber industry groups. The
Federal Reserve has put those groups back into the total Index to
preserve historical consistency. More
importantly, the NAICS data open windows to important individual
industries that never existed with the older SIC system.
The new system gives us much better estimates of the impact of
high-technology industries on the overall manufacturing economy, as well
as output indices for industries such as semiconductors, computers, and
communications equipment. Since
the historical data have been restated back as far back as the 1970s,
this puts the trends that have brought us to this point in an exciting
new light. The new data
underscore the depth of the contraction in the high technology economy.
Since the official onset of the recession in March 2001, the high
tech sector of the economy has made no contribution to overall growth in
manufacturing, whereas in the 1990s it added between 3 and 4 percentage
points to annual growth. Within
high tech, the output of computers and semiconductors has recovered from
the recession and is growing, whereas communications output continues to
fall. |
Over the course of the recession, the capacity utilization rate in high technology industries has crashed from a pre-recession peak of over 90 percent, down to its current level of just above 60 percent. It is no wonder that the makers of capital goods in these industries face such dire prospects. But when it
comes to the current state of the economy, it’s the story in the
older, bricks and mortar side of manufacturing that is the most
important. If you take out
the motor vehicle manufacturing industry, then the manufacturing output
of the economy has fallen by 0.3 percent for two consecutive months.
That kind of contraction is more reminiscent of the recession we
thought was behind us. The fear of
many analysts is that low interest rates and other sales gimmicks are
causing today's motor vehicle sales to borrow from the future.
If that is true, and sluggish sales are right around the corner,
the manufacturing economy will have to line up a few more star players
in a hurry.
Patrick M. Barkey
|
||
| Phone: (765)285-5926 | Fax: (765)285-8024 | www.bsu.edu/bbr/ | ||