The time-honored, industry standards of telephone surveys and
personal diaries fail to completely capture how much media Americans
use in their daily lives, information that could have major implications
for the media and advertising industries.
Researchers from Ball State University's Center for Media Design
found that media use by adults is more than double the extent reported
by standard survey research methods. Called the Middletown Media
Studies, the research asked questions and used methods that are
more extensive than those found in traditional media-measurement
methods.
First, along with the phone surveys and diaries, researchers observed—or
shadowed—101 people for a day, from wake up to bed time, and recorded
their actual media consumption.
Second, the studies looked at a wide range of media—television,
radio, telephone, Internet, books, newspapers, etc.—unlike typical
industry surveys that target only one medium.
“We found that phone surveys are largely useless in determining
media behavior. You might as well throw darts,” said Bob Papper,
a telecommunications professor and study co-author.
That does not mean phone survey research is irrelevant, researchers
said. All of the methods have certain weaknesses, and phone surveys
provided useful comparisons.
“Phone surveys reflect a person's perception of their media use
but not their actual behavior,” said Michael Holmes, professor
of communication studies and a member of the research team. “Diaries
give more detail than phone surveys, but we found observation provides
much more detail than diaries.”
Television viewing patterns are among the most glaring examples
of the limitations of current measuring techniques. Phone survey
participants, overall, watch television an average of two hours
per day. Diarists logged 4 hours and 38 minutes a day, but those
under observation watched 5 hours and 19 minutes per day. That's
a 164 percent difference between phone surveys and observations.
That pattern between the measurement methods held true in most
cases (time in minutes).
Media |
Phone
Survey |
Diary |
Observation |
Phone
survey to observation difference |
Home
Computer |
21 |
52 |
64 |
205
% |
Online |
29 |
57 |
78 |
169% |
Television |
121 |
278 |
319 |
164% |
Books |
18 |
17 |
36 |
100% |
Magazines |
8 |
10 |
14 |
75% |
Radio |
74 |
132 |
129 |
74% |
Newspapers |
15 |
26 |
17 |
13% |
“I think some of our most significant findings involve the complexity
of how people really use the media because we are looking at the
interrelationships among various media,” Papper said.
The “X” factor: multitasking in a media-rich society
Papper, Holmes and Mark Popovich, a journalism professor, pored
over previous studies that looked into the amount of time people
simultaneously use multiple media—studies that were mostly based
on telephone surveys.
“We suspect people in phone surveys either didn't or couldn't
accurately answer questions about simultaneous media use,” Holmes
said.
The researchers also found diarists tended not to make entries
about short-term, repeated media uses, such as making or receiving
phone calls, listening to the radio and e-mailing. So when all
media were factored in, observers made three times as many notations
of media use than consumers logged in their diaries.
“For example, the observation study results suggest that not only
did people watch the television programs they logged in their diaries,
but they probably also opened the mail, made a telephone call or
checked e-mail during a commercial; these uses tend to be omitted
from diaries,” Papper said.
The observation results also showed that people spend almost a
quarter of their media day using more than one medium at the same
time, a figure researchers called “astonishingly high.”
“We are really only beginning to dig into the results on multitasking,” Holmes
said. “We intend to develop a clear picture of simultaneous multiple
media use and how Americans are responding to the convergence of
media technology.”
How the studies were done
The three media usage studies were done in July and August 2003
with people living in “Middletown,” America - Muncie and Delaware
County, Indiana. The name comes from landmark sociological studies
done by Robert and Helen Lynd in the 1920s and '30s that cast Muncie
as the typical American town, or “Middletown.”
Along with shadowing 101 people, researchers collected 359 individual
diaries. The phone survey of 401 individuals asked questions from
various Pew Research Center surveys and the results between the
larger national Pew studies and the local phone survey were strikingly
similar.
“The research is part of an ongoing program to investigate how
the relationship between consumers and different media is changing
in the light of advances in technology,” said Mike Bloxham, the
center's director of testing and assessment. “We want to understand
the impact on business models, communications and society.”
download
pdf |